UGPL.net/blog
Posted on
Background

Snowflake and Databricks buy PostgreSQL know how

Author
Snowflake and Databricks buy PostgreSQL know how

Found on theregister.com

In the past few weeks in May and June 2025 Snowflake and Databricks with their acquisions of Neon and Crunchy Data followed Microsoft with their acquisition of Citus Data in 2019.

Immediately after that on their Data+AI Summit Databricks launched the Lakebase transactional database service which was developed by Neom and is based on the PostgreSQL open source DBMS technology and stores all of the data on cloud blob storage:

Taking into account the above videos of the product announcement of Lakebase we can now add a new column to the table from How DuckLake compares to Databricks, IceBerg, BigQuery and Snowflake?

Data architectural layers Lakebase Databricks Iceberg DuckLake BigQuery Snowflake
Main purpose transactional analytic file format in process database analytical analytical
Catalog Neom PostgreSQL service Unity Catatog in Databricks, Hive catalog in DeltaLake Iceberg Catalog Schema in SQL Database for both catalog and table metadata Spanner FoundationDB
Metadata layer Metadata files in open source formats like DeltaLake DeltaLake Metadata files Iceberg metadata files (manifest list, manifest files) Schema in SQL Database for both catalog and table metadata Spanner FoundationDB
Data layer Data files in open source formats (Parquet etc.) Data files (Parquet etc.) Data files (Parquet etc.) Data files (Parquet etc.) Data files Data files

All of the above offerings store data within the very cheap basic blob storage in the respective public cloud services and with the except of Iceberg and DuckLake, which define metadata management, all of the services allow for flexible scalability of the compute needed for all tasks and queries.

But, when DuckLake, BigQuery and Snowflake have chosen to use database technology to manage schema and table metadata, all metadata within Lakebase, Databricks and Iceberg is also managed in files within the basic cloud storage layer.

It will be seen, if the option to "branch" a database like it is used within GIT for source code will be the unique selling point (USP) and a killer feature for this product,
and it will be seen, what Snowflake can make out of their acquisition...

...but the fact is, it is a sexy offering to move all of your transactional and analytics workflows into one place and make profit from the serverless services, seamlessly scalable compute and basically infinite and cheap cloud storage.

P.S. Beware, cloud was usually or in average 20 to 25% percent more expensive than on premises, but may be "pay as you" go will be your way ;)